Barcelona March 1-3 2010, Russell Tribunal on Palestine finds EU states guilty of breaches of international and internal EU law
You may be interested to hear that the first Russell Tribunal on Palestine held 3 days of hearings in Barcelona March 1-3 this year. The Tribunal derives from the UK philosopher Bertrand Russell, who with Jean Paul Sartre and other luminaries set up the first Tribunal, a most influential affair- on the Vietnam war in 1965. This is only the third ever. The Russell Tribunal is a public awareness tribunal, and its sessions, which are held in public, have a quasi-legal format- involving expert and other witnesses presenting before an international jury. The jury formulate findings at the end and present them publicly.
The jury comprised Michael Mansfield QC (UK, a prominent barrister in human rights cases), Gisele Halimi (France, President of the Research Commission for Russell Tribunal on Vietnam), Jose Martin Pallin (Spain, Supreme Court judge), Ronnie Kasrils (South Africa, anti-apartheid leader and former ANC government minister), Mairead Corrigan-Maguire (Northern Ireland, Nobel Peace Prize, 1976), Cynthia McKinney (US, ex-Congresswoman and Presidential candidate for Green Party), Aminata Traore (Mali, activist, write, former minister), Alberto San Juan (Spain, actor, activist), Arcadi Oliveres (Spain, Professor of Economics at Autonomous University of Barcelona, social justice activist).
Various people with background knowledge or involvement with Israel/Palestine gave expert or other witness statements, including Desmond Travers (Ireland), a member of the UN appointed Goldstone Mission, Luisa Morgantini (Italy), former Vice Pres of European Parliament (by video), Clare Short (UK) a Member of Parliament and former minister. Raji Sourani (Palestine), Vice-Pres of the Internat Federation of Human Rights was also due to present but could not get out of Gaza!
Issues relating to health and Geneva Convention violations regarding collective punishment, blocked access to supplies and services vital to life, and attacks on medical personnel and facilities (Gaza Blockade & Operation Cast Lead) were addressed by myself and by Ewa Jasiewicz, a journalist and activist who was in Gaza as volunteer during Operation Cast Lead Dec –Jan 08/09. I enclose as attachment the material I compiled for my presentation. There’s a lot of strong material there. Do use it if useful.
The focus of this Tribunal was on the role of the EU, and its adherence to its own codes and to international law, at a time when Israel is being afforded ever greater trading and other advantages by the EU, as if a honorary European state.
The jury findings are copied below. The intention is to present them to relevant parties in the EU, and as widely as possible elsewhere. You will note that they call for sanctions against Israel. Please do disseminate.
Below these there is a list of Internet and video (youtube etc) coverage of the event to date.
Yours
Derek Summerfield
————–
Russell Tribunal on Palestine finds EU states guilty of breaches of international and internal EU law
The first session of The Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RTP) has found European Union member States to be in Breach of International and internal European Union Law with respect to the protection of Palestinian human rights.
Full findings here: http://www.russelltribunalonpalestine.org/article-findings-first-session-of-russell-tribunal-on-palestine-barcelona-session-45974035.html
The jury, comprised of eminent legal experts and human rights defenders heard two days of reports from international experts and witnesses on the issues of:
– the principle of respect for the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination;
– the settlements and the plundering of natural resources;
– the annexation of East Jerusalem;
– the blockade of Gaza and operation “Cast Lead”;
– the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;
– the European Union/Israel Association Agreement.
The RTP found that Israel was violating the Palestinian right to self determination as enshrined in The Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples (A/Res. 1514(XV), 14 Dec. 1960) and all United Nations General Assembly (NGA) resolutions that have reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination since 1969 (A/Res. 2535 B (XXIV), 10 Dec. 1969, and, inter alia, A/Res. 3236 (XXIX), 22 Nov. 1974, 52/114, 12 Dec. 1997, etc);
Furthermore, by occupying Palestinian territories since June 1967 and refusing to leave them, Israel violates the Security Council resolutions that demand its withdrawal from the territories concerned (SC/Res. 242, 22 Nov. 1967; 338, 22 Oct. 1973)
The RTP also found Israel´s discriminatory acts towards Palestinian populations inside Israeli territory and occupied Palestinian territory as violating the Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid of 18 July 1976, which is not binding on Israel, though this does not exonerate Israel in that regard.
The acts include the closure of the borders of the Gaza Strip and restrictions on the freedom of movement of its inhabitants; prevention of the return of Palestinian refugees to their home or land of origin; prohibition on the free use by Palestinians of certain natural resources such as the watercourses within their land.
By annexing Jerusalem in July 1980 and maintaining the annexation, Israel violates the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force, as stated by the Security Council (SC/Res. 478, 20 August 1980).
By constructing a Wall in the West Bank on Palestinian territory that it occupies, Israel denies the Palestinians access to their own land, violates their property rights and seriously restricts the freedom of movement of the Palestinian population, thereby violating article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political rights to which Israel has been a party since 3 October 1991; the illegality of the construction of the Wall was confirmed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004, which was endorsed by the UNGA in its resolution ES-10/15.
By systematically building settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank, Israel breaches the rules of international humanitarian law governing occupation, in particular article 49 of the Fourth General Convention of 12 August 1949, by which Israel has been bound since 6 July 1951. This point was noted by the ICJ in the above-mentioned Advisory Opinion.
By pursuing a policy of targeted killings against Palestinians whom it describes as “terrorists” without first attempting to arrest them, Israel violates the right to life of the persons concerned, a right enshrined in article 6 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966.
By maintaining a blockade on the Gaza Strip in breach of the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949 (art. 33), which prohibits collective punishment.
By inflicting extensive and serious damage, especially on persons and civilian property, and by using prohibited methods of combat during operation “Cast Lead” in Gaza (December 2008 – January 2009).
EU member states were found to be violating provisions of the Lisbon Treaty (2010) including foundational principles of the EU itself as set down in article 2 which confirms attachment ´to the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights´.
EU states as high contracting parties to the Geneva Conventions 1949 were found to be breaching elementary obligations of due diligence and ensurance of peremptory legal norms which cannot be derogated from, by failing to react to and remedy violations of the convention committed by Israel. As such they were found to be assisting Israel in its breaches of international law.
Article 146 compels EU Member states ´to undertake to enact any legislation necessary to provide effective penal sanctions for persons committing, or ordering to be committed, any of the grave breaches of the present Convention defined in the following Article.´
Grave breaches include: wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person, compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power, or wilfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial and extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
International Law Commission articles on state responsibility for wrongful acts were found to apply to EU member states as is the 1966 covenant on Civil and Political Rights which states:
´Every State has the duty to promote through joint and separate action universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms in accordance with the Charter´.
Reports from experts brought to light passive and active forms of assistance in the alleged commission of breaches by the EU and its member states particularly through:
– exports of weapons and components of weapons by EU states to Israel, some of which were used during the conflict in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009;
– exports of produce from settlements in occupied territories to the EU;
– participation by the settlements in European research programmes;
– failure of the EU to complain about the destruction by Israel of infrastructure in Gaza during the Cast Lead operation;
– failure of the EU to demand Israeli compliance with clauses concerning respect for human rights contained in the various association agreements concluded by the EU with Israel;
– the decision by the EU to upgrade its relations with Israel under the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Agreement;
– tolerance by the EU and its member states of certain economic relations between European companies and Israel involving commercial projects in the occupied territories, such as the management of the Tovlan landfill site in the Jordan valley and the construction of a tramline in East Jerusalem.
The participation of illegal Israeli settlements in European research programmes, the failure of the EU to complain during the “Cast Lead” operation about the destruction by Israel of infrastructure that the EU had funded in Gaza, and the (proposed) upgrading of bilateral relations between the EU and Israel are characterized by a number of experts as assistance to Israel in its alleged violations of international law.
In conclusion of the first Barcelona session, the RTP calls on:
(i) the EU and its member states to fulfil its obligations forthwith by rectifying the breaches specified in the final ruling
(ii) the EU in particular to implement the EU Parliament resolution requiring the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and thereby putting an end to the impunity that Israel has benefited from until now.
(iii) EU Member states to implement the recommendation at para 1975 (a) of the UN Fact Finding Mission Report on the Gaza Conflict (Goldstone Report) regarding the collection of evidence and the exercise of UJ against Israeli and Palestinian suspects; and
(iv) EU Member states to repeal of any requirements in any member state that a suspect must be a resident of that member state or of any impediments to the compliance with the duty to prosecute or extradite for trial all suspected war criminals sought out by the member states
(v) EU Member states to ensure that UJ laws and procedures are made as effective as possible in practice, including through co-ordination and the implementation of agreements on the mutual co-operation of states on criminal matters, through the EU contact points on cross-border and international crime, EUROPOL and INTERPOL etc.
(vi) EU Member states to make no regressive changes that would blunt the effect of existing Universal Jurisdiction laws, so as to ensure that no EU member state becomes a safe haven for suspected war criminals
(vii) The Parliaments of Austria, France, Greece and Italy to pass laws providing the penal legislation required by article 146 IVGC to enable UJ to be exercised in those countries.
(viii) individuals, groups and organisations to take all avenues open to them to achieve compliance by EU member states and the EU of their aforementioned obligations, as exemplified by the use of universal jurisdiction over individual criminal suspects, domestic civil proceedings against individual governments and/or their departments or agencies and private companies, in respect of which it is the intention of the RTP to commission and/or encourage others to commission research into which countries and jurisdictions these matters can most effectively be pursued; and
(ix) the existing legal actions and campaigns in the context of BDS to be stepped up and widened within the EU and globally.
The Russell Tribunal on Palestine calls on the European Union and on each of its member states to impose the necessary sanctions on its partner Israel through diplomatic, trade and cultural measures in order to end the impunity that it has enjoyed for decades. Should the EU lack the necessary courage to do so, the Tribunal counts on the citizens of Europe to bring the necessary pressure to bear on it by all appropriate means.
CONTACT – Russel Tribunal on Palestine Co-ordinator Frank Barat 0044 771 8998 695 russelltribunal@yahoo.co.uk
Pieces on Tribunal
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/95992
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17962
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/03/russell-tribunal-on-palestine-barcelona.html
http://jta.org/news/article/2010/03/07/1010947/israel-condemns-russell-tribunal-on-palestine
Videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OUlWWDYno0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_WfJ7n5wE4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRjG7XrpKZY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_vi3peAXB0
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4882